Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
11
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Analysis of Magnetic Plastics Market Size, Share, Trends and Global Industry Chain Structure Published in 2016 Report[2016/10/26]
-
Ford's electric-vehicle strategy[2016/09/22]
-
Multiple lane closures on Downtown Connector this weekend[2016/09/24]
-
New Power[2016/10/27]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
How to stop your smartphone battery from exploding[2016/09/30]
-
With Samsung's Note7 Crisis in Full Bloom, a New Patent Filing Reveals Samsung Rethinking Removable Batteries[2016/10/11]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Airline ban on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 widens as concern grows about fire risk[2016/10/17]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
Henrik Fisker is using a revolutionary new battery to power his Tesla killer[2016/10/17]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]